skip navigation

Skip Nav

Clinical Guidelines Portal

Clinical Guidelines Portal

Guidelines for the Prevention and Treatment of Opportunistic Infections in HIV-Infected Adults and Adolescents

Endemic Mycoses Plus Aspergillosis

Cryptococcosis

Epidemiology

Most HIV-associated cryptococcal infections are caused by Cryptococcus neoformans, but occasionally Cryptococcus gattii is recognized. C. neoformans is found worldwide, whereas C. gattii most often is found in Australia and similar subtropical regions and in the Pacific Northwest. Before the era of effective antiretroviral therapy (ART), approximately 5% to 8% of HIV-infected patients in developed countries were diagnosed with disseminated cryptococcosis.1 Current estimates indicate that every year, nearly 1 million cases of cryptococcal meningitis are diagnosed worldwide and the disease accounts for more than 600,000 deaths.2 In the last decade, incidence has declined substantially in areas with access to effective ART, and most new infections are being recognized in patients recently diagnosed with HIV infection.3 Most cases are observed in patients who have CD4 T-lymphocyte (CD4) cell counts <100 cells/mm3.

Clinical Manifestations

In HIV-infected patients, cryptococcosis commonly presents as a subacute meningitis or meningoencephalitis with fever, malaise, and headache.1 Classic meningeal symptoms and signs, such as neck stiffness and photophobia, occur in only one-quarter to one-third of patients. Some patients experience encephalopathic symptoms, such as lethargy, altered mentation, personality changes, and memory loss that are usually a result of increased intracranial pressure, thought to result from impaired cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) absorption, or yeast infection of the brain.

Cryptococcosis usually is disseminated when diagnosed in an HIV-infected patient. Any organ of the body can be involved, and skin lesions may be myriad, including umbilicated skin lesions mimicking molluscum contagiosum. Isolated pulmonary infection is also possible; symptoms and signs include cough and dyspnea in association with an abnormal chest radiograph, which typically demonstrates lobar consolidation, although lobar and nodular infiltrates have been reported. Pulmonary cryptococcosis may present as acute respiratory distress syndrome and mimic Pneumocystis pneumonia.

Diagnosis

Analysis of CSF generally demonstrates mildly elevated levels of serum protein, low-to-normal glucose concentrations, and pleocytosis consisting mostly of lymphocytes. Some HIV-infected patients will have very few CSF inflammatory cells, but an India ink or Gram’s stain preparation often will demonstrate numerous yeast forms. The opening pressure in the CSF may be elevated, with pressures ≥25 cm H2O occurring in 60 to 80% of patients.4,5

Cryptococcal disease can be diagnosed through culture of blood or CSF, CSF microscopy with India ink staining, or cryptococcal antigen (CrAg) detection. In patients with HIV-related cryptococcal meningitis, 55% of blood cultures and 95% of CSF cultures are positive and visible colonies can be detected within 7 days. India ink staining of CSF demonstrates encapsulated yeast in 60% to 80% of cases, but many laboratories in the United States no longer perform this test. CSF CrAg is usually positive in patients with meningoencephalitis. Serum CrAg is usually positive in both meningeal and non-meningeal infection and may be present weeks to months before symptom onset.6 A positive serum CrAg should prompt a lumbar puncture to rule out meningeal disease. Three methods exist for antigen detection: latex agglutination, enzyme immunoassays, and lateral flow assay (a newly developed dipstick test). Testing for the antigen is a useful initial screening tool in diagnosing cryptococcosis in HIV-infected patients,7 and it may be particularly useful when lumbar punctures need to be delayed or are refused.

Preventing Exposure

Cryptococcus is ubiquitous in the environment; it is found in soils. HIV-infected patients cannot completely avoid exposure to C. neoformans or C. gattii. Limited epidemiological evidence suggests that exposure to aged bird droppings may increase risk of infection.

Preventing Disease

Because the incidence of cryptococcal disease is low among HIV-infected patients in the United States, routine testing of asymptomatic persons for serum cryptococcal polysaccharide antigen is not recommended for patients residing there.

Prospective, controlled trials indicate that prophylactic fluconazole or itraconazole can reduce the frequency of primary cryptococcal disease in patients who have CD4 cell counts <100 cells/mm3.8,9 However, in the United States, primary prophylaxis or screening for serum CrAg in asymptomatic patients is not recommended because of the relative infrequency of cryptococcal disease, lack of survival benefit associated with prophylaxis, possibility of drug interactions, potential antifungal drug resistance, and cost (BII).

Treating Disease

Treating cryptococcosis consists of three phases: induction, consolidation, and maintenance therapy. The preferred induction treatment for cryptococcal meningitis and other forms of extrapulmonary cryptococcosis is a lipid formulation of amphotericin B in combination with flucytosine (AI). Historically, amphotericin B deoxycholate was the preferred formulation at a dose of 0.7 to 1.0 mg/kg daily (AI). However, based on the growing body of evidence that lipid formulations of amphotericin B are effective for disseminated cryptococcosis and should be used as the preferred formulation (AI), particularly in patients who experience clinically significant renal dysfunction during therapy or who are likely to develop it. The non-comparative CLEAR study demonstrated a 58% response rate in HIV-infected patients treated with amphotericin B lipid complex at mean dose of 4.4 mg/kg daily.10 In a Dutch and Australian study, a 3-week course of liposomal amphotericin B (4 mg/kg daily) resulted in more rapid sterilization of CSF than amphotericin B deoxycholate (0.7 mg/kg daily).11 A recently published comparison of amphotericin B deoxycholate (0.7 mg/kg daily), and liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome®) (3 mg/kg or 6 mg/kg daily) showed similar efficacy for the three regimens, but nephrotoxicity was lower with 3 mg/kg daily liposomal amphotericin B.12
 
Therefore, liposomal amphotericin B, in a dose of 3 to 4 mg/kg/daily, is recommended as the preferred amphotericin B formulation for primary induction therapy (AI), based on clinical experience and reduced renal toxicity compared to amphotericin B deoxycholate. Amphotericin B lipid complex in a dose of 5 mg/kg daily is an alternative (BII).

Amphotericin B formulations should be combined with flucytosine at a dose of 100 mg/kg daily in 4 divided doses for ≥2 weeks in patients with normal renal function and is the preferred regimen for primary induction therapy (AI). Renal function should be monitored closely and the flucytosine dose adjusted accordingly for patients with renal impairment. The addition of flucytosine to amphotericin B during acute treatment is associated with more rapid sterilization of CSF.13-16 A recent randomized clinical trial also showed that the combination of amphotericin B deoxycholate in a dose of 1.0 mg/kg/d combined with flucytosine was associated with improved survival compared to the same dose of amphotericin B without flucytosine.17

Amphotericin B deoxycholate in combination with fluconazole 400 mg daily was inferior to amphotericin B in combination with flucytosine for clearing Cryptococcus from CSF.18 However, in two randomized trials, amphotericin B plus fluconazole 800 mg daily compared favorably with amphotericin B alone.17,19 Therefore, amphotericin B deoxycholate or lipid-formulated amphotericin B alone or combined with fluconazole at 800 mg daily may be viable options in some circumstances but are less preferable alternatives than lipid-formulated amphotericin B combined with flucytosine (BI).

Fluconazole (400–800 mg daily) combined with flucytosine is also a potential alternative to amphotericin B regimens (BII).20 Fluconazole alone, based on early fungicidal activity, is inferior to amphotericin B21 for induction therapy and is recommended only for patients who cannot tolerate or do not respond to standard treatment. If it is used for primary induction therapy, the starting daily dose should be 1200 mg (CII).22

After at least 2 weeks of successful induction therapy—defined as substantial clinical improvement and a negative CSF culture after repeat lumbar puncture—amphotericin B and flucytosine can be discontinued and follow-up or consolidation therapy initiated with fluconazole 400 mg daily (AI). This therapy should continue for at least 8 weeks (AI).13,14,23 Subsequently, the fluconazole should be reduced to 200 mg daily and continued as chronic maintenance therapy to complete at least one year of azole therapy (see Preventing Recurrence section below).24 Limited data are available for the newer triazoles, voriconazole and posaconazole, as either primary or maintenance therapy for patients with cryptococcosis. Most of the data on use of these extended-spectrum triazole antifungals have been reported for treatment of refractory cases, with success rates of approximately 50%.25,26 At this time, the role of posaconazole and voriconazole in the management of cryptococcosis is not established. Voriconazole should be used cautiously with HIV protease inhibitors and efavirenz.

Non-central-nervous-system (CNS), extrapulmonary cryptococcosis and diffuse pulmonary disease should be treated similarly to CNS disease (BIII). For mild-to-moderate symptoms and focal pulmonary infiltrates, treatment with fluconazole (400 mg daily for 12 months) combined with effective ART is appropriate (BIII). All patients should have their CSF sampled to rule out CNS disease.

Special Considerations with Regard to Starting ART

Optimal timing for initiation of ART in patients with acute cryptococcal meningitis is controversial. One randomized, controlled trial that included 35 patients with cryptococcal meningitis suggested that ART was safe when started within the first 14 days of diagnosis.27 A subsequent study from Africa demonstrated significantly worse outcomes in 54 patients started on ART within 72 hours of cryptococcal meningitis diagnosis compared with those in which ART was delayed for at least 10 weeks.28 However, in the latter study, cryptococcal meningitis was managed with fluconazole alone, and ART consisted of nevirapine, stavudine, and lamivudine. Neither fluconazole alone nor the latter ART regimen are recommended as preferred initial treatment in the United States. Lastly, another randomized clinical trial conducted in Africa in hospitalized patients with acute cryptococcal meningitis was recently halted by a Data and Safety Monitoring Board due to higher mortality in the early ART arm (defined as ART started during the hospitalization) compared to the arm in which patients waited to start ART until after their discharge from the hospital. In contrast to the other African study, this study used amphotericin B plus fluconazole during the induction phase of antifungal treatment (http://www.niaid.nih.gov/news/newsreleases/2012/Pages/COAT.aspx). Such data must be viewed with caution until fully reported and analyzed.

In patients with severe cryptococcosis (particularly those with elevated increased intracranial pressure [ICP]), it may be prudent to delay initiation of ART until induction (the first 2 weeks) or the total induction/consolidation phase (10 weeks) has been completed. However, for patients with advanced immunosuppression (CD4 count <50 cells/mm3) earlier initiation of ART may be necessary (BIII). If the treating physician elects to begin effective ART earlier, preparations should be made to aggressively address complications of immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) such as elevated ICP (BIII).

All the triazole antifungals have the potential for complex, and possibly bidirectional, interactions with certain antiretroviral agents. Table 5 lists these interactions and recommendations for dosage adjustments, where feasible.

Monitoring of Response to Therapy and Adverse Events (including IRIS)

ICP can cause clinical deterioration despite a microbiologic response and is more likely if the CSF opening lumbar pressure is ≥25cm H2O4,13 when obtained in the lateral decubitus position with good manometrics assured. In one large clinical trial, increased ICP was associated with 93% of deaths during the first 2 weeks of therapy and 40% of deaths during weeks 3 to 10.4 Although it is uncertain which patients with high opening lumbar pressures will deteriorate, those with symptoms and signs of ICP require immediate clinical intervention.

Lumbar opening pressure should be measured in all patients with cryptococcal meningitis at the time of diagnosis. Measures to decrease ICP should be used for all patients with confusion, blurred vision, papilledema, lower extremity clonus, or other neurologic signs of increased pressure. Lumbar punctures usually are recommended for initial management. One approach is to remove a volume of CSF (typically 20–30 mL) that at least halves the opening pressure29 and repeat daily until symptoms and signs consistently improve. CSF shunting through a lumbar drain or ventriculostomy should be considered for patients who cannot tolerate lumbar puncture or in whom signs and symptoms of cerebral edema persist after multiple lumbar taps (BIII). Corticosteroids and mannitol have been shown to be ineffective in managing ICP and are not recommended (CIII). Acetazolamide is hazardous as therapy for increased ICP management in those without signs IRIS and is not recommended (BII).

After the first 2 weeks of treatment, many experts would advocate a repeat lumbar puncture to ensure that viable organisms have been cleared from the CSF. Even in patients who have clinical improvement, positive CSF cultures after 2 weeks of therapy are predictive of future relapse and less favorable outcome. In such cases, some experts would continue amphotericin B plus flucytosine until the CSF cultures are negative (BIII). Monitoring titers of cryptococcal polysaccharide antigen in serum or CSF is of no value in determining response to therapy and is not recommended. If new symptoms or clinical findings occur later, a repeat lumbar puncture, with measurement of opening lumbar pressure and CSF culture, should be performed.

Patients treated with amphotericin B formulations should be monitored for dose-dependent nephrotoxicity and electrolyte disturbances. Pre-infusion administration of 500 to 1000 mL of normal saline appears to reduce the risk of nephrotoxicity during amphotericin B treatment. Thirty minutes before infusion, acetaminophen (650 mg) and diphenhydramine (25–50 mg) or hydrocortisone (50–100 mg) typically are administered in an attempt to ameliorate infusion-related adverse reactions (BIII), but data supporting these practices are scant. Meperidine (25–50 mg titrated during infusion) is effective for preventing and treating amphotericin B-associated rigors (BII).

In patients receiving flucytosine, dosage should be adjusted based on changes in creatinine clearance and might be guided by flucytosine levels. Peak serum flucytosine levels should be obtained 2 hours after an oral dose and the therapeutic range is between 30 and 80 µg/mL. Alternatively, frequent (i.e., at least bi-weekly) blood counts can be performed to detect development of cytopenia. Patients treated with flucytosine also should be monitored for hepatotoxicity and gastrointestinal toxicities.

An estimated 30% of HIV-infected patients with cryptococcal meningitis experience IRIS after initiation or re-initiation of effective ART.30,31 Patients who have cryptococcal IRIS are more likely to be antiretroviral naive, have higher HIV RNA levels, and have less CSF inflammation on initial presentation.32 Distinguishing IRIS from treatment failure may be difficult. In general, cryptococcal IRIS presents with worsening clinical disease despite microbiological evidence of effective antifungal therapy,32,33 whereas treatment failure is associated with continued positive cultures. Appropriate management of IRIS is to continue both ART and antifungal therapy and reduce elevated ICP, if present (AII). In patients with severe symptoms of IRIS, some specialists recommend a brief course of glucocorticosteroids (CIII), but data based management strategies have not been developed.

Managing Treatment Failure

Treatment failure is defined as lack of clinical improvement after 2 weeks of appropriate therapy, including management of increased ICP, with continued positive cultures; or relapse after an initial clinical response, defined as recurrence of symptoms with a positive CSF culture after ≥4 weeks of treatment. Direct primary fluconazole resistance with C. neoformans has been reported in the United States but is uncommon.34 Therefore, susceptibility testing is not routinely recommended for initial management of cryptococcosis. Isolates collected to evaluate for persistence or relapse should, however, be checked for susceptibility and compared with the original isolate. Strains with fluconazole minimum inhibitory concentrations ≥16 µg/mL are considered fluconazole resistant.35

Optimal therapy for patients with treatment failure has not been established. Patients who fail to respond to induction with fluconazole monotherapy should be switched to amphotericin B, with or without flucytosine, and remain on it until a clinical response occurs. Liposomal amphotericin B (4–6 mg/kg/day) or amphotericin B lipid complex (5 mg/kg/day) is better tolerated and has greater efficacy than deoxycholate formulation in this setting11,12,36 and should be considered when initial treatment with other regimens fails (AII).

Higher doses of fluconazole in combination with flucytosine also may be useful (BIII). Echinocandins have no activity against Cryptococcus spp. and are not recommended for clinical management of cryptococcosis (AII). The newer triazoles—posaconazole and voriconazole—have activity against Cryptococcus spp. in vitro and may have a role in salvage therapy, but probably offer no specific advantages over fluconazole unless in vitro susceptibility testing indicates fluconazole resistance. Most clinical failures are a result of inadequate induction therapy, drug interactions that interfere with treatment, or development of IRIS and are not due to drug resistance.

Preventing Recurrence

When to Start Secondary Prophylaxis

Patients who have completed the first 10 weeks of induction and consolidation therapy for acute cryptococcosis should be given chronic maintenance or suppressive therapy with fluconazole 200 mg daily (AI). Itraconazole is inferior to fluconazole for preventing relapse of cryptococcal disease and should not be used (CI).23

When to Stop Secondary Prophylaxis

Only a small number of patients have been evaluated for relapse after successful antifungal therapy for cryptococcosis and discontinuation of secondary prophylaxis while on ART. In a European study, recurrence of cryptococcosis was seen in none of 39 subjects on potent ART whose antifungal therapy was discontinued. In this cohort, when maintenance therapy was stopped, the median CD4 cell count was 297 cells/mm3, the median HIV RNA concentration was <500 copies/mL, and the median time on potent ART was 25 months.37 A prospective, randomized study of 60 patients in Thailand documented no recurrences of cryptococcosis during 48 weeks of follow-up among 22 patients whose antifungal therapy was discontinued after having achieved a CD4 count >100 cells/mm3 with a sustained undetectable HIV RNA level for 3 months on potent ART.38 Given these data and inference from data on discontinuation of secondary prophylaxis for other HIV-associated opportunistic infections, it is reasonable to discontinue chronic antifungal maintenance therapy for cryptococcosis in patients whose CD4 cell counts are ≥100 cells/mm3, who have undetectable viral loads on ART for >3 months, and who have received a minimum of 1 year of azole antifungal chronic maintenance therapy after successful treatment of cryptococcosis (BII).39 Secondary prophylaxis should be reinitiated if the CD4 count decreases again to <100 cells/mm3 (AlII).

Special Considerations During Pregnancy

The diagnosis of cryptococcal infections during pregnancy is similar to that in non-pregnant adults. Treatment should be initiated promptly after a diagnosis is confirmed. It should be emphasized that the postpartum period may be a high-risk period for the development of IRIS.
 
Lipid formulations of amphotericin B are the preferred initial regimen for the treatment of cryptococcal meningoencephalitis, disseminated disease, or severe pulmonary cryptococcosis in pregnant patients. Extensive clinical experience with amphotericin has not documented teratogenicity. Neonates born to women on chronic amphotericin B at delivery should be evaluated for renal dysfunction and hypokalemia. 

Flucytosine was teratogenic in animal studies, and human experience is limited to case reports and small series. Therefore, its use should be considered only when the benefits outweigh its risks to the fetus (CIII).

Congenital malformations similar to those observed in animals, including craniofacial and limb abnormalities, have been reported in infants born to mothers who received fluconazole at doses of ≥400 mg/day or more through or beyond the first trimester of pregnancy.40 Although several cohort studies have shown no increased risk of birth defects with early pregnancy exposure, most of these involved low doses and short term exposure to fluconazole.41,42 Based on the reported birth defects, the FDA has changed the pregnancy category for fluconazole from C to D for any use other than a single, low dose for treatment of vaginal candidiasis, (http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/ucm266030.htm) and use of fluconazole in the first trimester should be considered only if the benefits clearly outweigh risks. For pregnant women, amphotericin should be continued throughout the first trimester with consideration of switching to oral fluconazole, if clinically appropriate, after the first trimester.

Although there are case reports of birth defects in infants exposed to itraconazole, prospective cohort studies of over 300 women with first trimester exposure did not show an increased risk of malformation.43,44 However, in general azole antifungals should be avoided during the first trimester of pregnancy (BIII). Voriconazole and posaconazole are teratogenic and embryotoxic in animal studies, voriconazole at doses lower than recommended human doses; there are no adequate controlled studies in humans. These drugs should be avoided in pregnancy, especially in the first trimester (AIII).

 

Recommendations for Treating and Preventing Cryptococcosis

No title

Treating Cryptococcal Meningitis

Induction Therapy (For At Least 2 Weeks, Followed by Consolidation Therapy)

Preferred Regimens:
  • Liposomal amphotericin B 3–4 mg/kg IV daily + flucytosine 25 mg/kg PO QID (AI)
Note: Flucytosine dose should be adjusted in renal impairment

Alternative Regimens:
  • Amphotericin B lipid complex 5 mg/kg IV daily + flucytosine 25 mg/kg PO QID (BII)
  • Amphotericin B (deoxycholate 0.7-1.0 mg/kg IV daily + flucytosine 25 mg/kg PO QID (AI)
  • Liposomal amphotericin B 3–4 mg/kg IV daily + fluconazole 800 mg PO or IV daily (BIII)
  • Amphotericin B (deoxycholate 0.7-1.0 mg/kg IV daily) + fluconazole 800 mg PO or IV daily (BI)
  • Liposomal amphotericin B 3-4 mg/kg IV daily alone (BII)
  • Fluconazole 400–800 mg PO or IV daily + flucytosine 25 mg/kg PO QID (BII)
  • Fluconazole 1200 mg PO or IV daily alone (CII)
Consolidation Therapy (For At Least 8 Weeks, Followed by Maintenance Therapy)
  • To begin after at least 2 weeks of successful induction therapy (defined as substantial clinical improvement and a negative CSF culture after repeat LP)
Preferred Regimen:
  • Fluconazole 400 mg PO or IV once daily (AI)

Alternative Regimen:
  • Itraconazole 200 mg PO BID (CI)
Maintenance Therapy

Preferred Regimen: 
  • Fluconazole 200 mg PO for at least 1 year (AI)
Stopping Maintenance Therapy

If the following criteria are fulfilled (BII): 
  • Completed initial (induction, consolidation) therapy, and at least 1 year on maintenance therapy, and
  • Remains asymptomatic from cryptococcal infection, and
  • CD4 count ≥100 cells/µL for ≥3 months and suppressed HIV RNA in response to effective ART
Restarting Maintenance Therapy: 
  • If CD4 count decline to ≤100 cells/µL (AIII)
Treating Non-CNS, Extrapulmonary Cryptococcosis and for Diffuse Pulmonary Disease: 
  • Same treatment as for CNS disease (BIII)
Treating Non-CNS Cryptocococcosis with Mild-to-Moderate Symptoms and Focal Pulmonary Infiltrates: 
  • Fluconazole 400 mg PO daily for 12 months (BIII
Other Considerations
  • Addition of flucytosine to amphotericin B has been associated with more rapid sterilization of CSF, decreased risk for subsequent relapse, and improved survival.
  • Patients receiving flucytosine should have either blood levels monitored (peak level 2 hours after dose should be between 30–80 µg/mL) or close following of complete blood counts to identify developing cytopenias. Dosage should be adjusted in patients with renal insufficiency (BII).
  • Opening pressure should always be measured when a LP is performed. Repeated LPs or CSF shunting are essential to effectively manage symptomatic increased ICP.
  • Corticosteroids and mannitol are ineffective in reducing ICP and are NOT recommended (BII).
  • Infection due to C. gattii should be treated similarly to C. neoformans (BIII).
  • All the triazole antifungals have the potential to interact with certain antiretroviral agents and other anti-infective agents. These interactions are complex and can be bidirectional. Table 5 lists these interactions and recommends dosage adjustments where feasible.
Key to Acronyms: BID = twice daily; CD4 = CD4 T lymphocyte cell; CNS = central nervous system; CSF = cerebrospinal fluid; ICP = intracranial pressure; IV = intravenous; LP = lumbar puncture; PO = orally; QID = four times a day

References

  1. Aberg J, WG. P. Cryptococcosis. In: Dolin R MH, Saag MS, ed. AIDS Therapy. New York, NY: Churcill Livingstone; 2002:498-510.
  2. Park BJ, Wannemuehler KA, Marston BJ, Govender N, Pappas PG, Chiller TM. Estimation of the current global burden of cryptococcal meningitis among persons living with HIV/AIDS. AIDS. Feb 20 2009;23(4):525-530. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19182676.
  3. Mirza SA, Phelan M, Rimland D, et al. The changing epidemiology of cryptococcosis: an update from population-based active surveillance in 2 large metropolitan areas, 1992-2000. Clin Infect Dis. Mar 15 2003;36(6):789-794. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12627365.
  4. Graybill JR, Sobel J, Saag M, et al. Diagnosis and management of increased intracranial pressure in patients with AIDS and cryptococcal meningitis. The NIAID Mycoses Study Group and AIDS Cooperative Treatment Groups. Clin Infect Dis. Jan 2000;30(1):47-54. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10619732.
  5. Bicanic T, Brouwer AE, Meintjes G, et al. Relationship of cerebrospinal fluid pressure, fungal burden and outcome in patients with cryptococcal meningitis undergoing serial lumbar punctures. AIDS. Mar 27 2009;23(6):701-706. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19279443.
  6. French N, Gray K, Watera C, et al. Cryptococcal infection in a cohort of HIV-1-infected Ugandan adults. AIDS. May 3 2002;16(7):1031-1038. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11953469.
  7. Powderly WG, Cloud GA, Dismukes WE, Saag MS. Measurement of cryptococcal antigen in serum and cerebrospinal fluid: value in the management of AIDS-associated cryptococcal meningitis. Clin Infect Dis. May 1994;18(5):789-792. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8075272.
  8. Powderly WG, Finkelstein D, Feinberg J, et al. A randomized trial comparing fluconazole with clotrimazole troches for the prevention of fungal infections in patients with advanced human immunodeficiency virus infection. NIAID AIDS Clinical Trials Group. N Engl J Med. Mar 16 1995;332(11):700-705. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7854376.
  9. McKinsey DS, Wheat LJ, Cloud GA, et al. Itraconazole prophylaxis for fungal infections in patients with advanced human immunodeficiency virus infection: randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group. Clin Infect Dis. May 1999;28(5):1049-1056. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10452633.
  10. Baddour LM, Perfect JR, Ostrosky-Zeichner L. Successful use of amphotericin B lipid complex in the treatment of cryptococcosis. Clin Infect Dis. May 1 2005;40 Suppl 6:S409-413. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15809927.
  11. Leenders AC, Reiss P, Portegies P, et al. Liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome) compared with amphotericin B both followed by oral fluconazole in the treatment of AIDS-associated cryptococcal meningitis. AIDS. Oct 1997;11(12):1463-1471. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9342068.
  12. Hamill RJ, Sobel JD, El-Sadr W, et al. Comparison of 2 doses of liposomal amphotericin B and conventional amphotericin B deoxycholate for treatment of AIDS-associated acute cryptococcal meningitis: a randomized, double-blind clinical trial of efficacy and safety. Clin Infect Dis. Jul 15 2010;51(2):225-232. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20536366.
  13. van der Horst CM, Saag MS, Cloud GA, et al. Treatment of cryptococcal meningitis associated with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group and AIDS Clinical Trials Group. N Engl J Med. Jul 3 1997;337(1):15-21. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9203426.
  14. Saag MS, Graybill RJ, Larsen RA, et al. Practice guidelines for the management of cryptococcal disease. Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. Apr 2000;30(4):710-718. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10770733.
  15. Dromer F, Mathoulin-Pelissier S, Launay O, Lortholary O, French Cryptococcosis Study G. Determinants of disease presentation and outcome during cryptococcosis: the CryptoA/D study. PLoS Med. Feb 2007;4(2):e21. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17284154.
  16. Dromer F, Bernede-Bauduin C, Guillemot D, Lortholary O, French Cryptococcosis Study G. Major role for amphotericin B-flucytosine combination in severe cryptococcosis. PLoS One. 2008;3(8):e2870. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18682846.
  17. Day JN, Chau TT, Wolbers M, et al. Combination antifungal therapy for cryptococcal meningitis. N Engl J Med. Apr 4 2013;368(14):1291-1302. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23550668.
  18. Brouwer AE, Rajanuwong A, Chierakul W, et al. Combination antifungal therapies for HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis: a randomised trial. Lancet. May 29 2004;363(9423):1764-1767. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15172774.
  19. Pappas PG, Chetchotisakd P, Larsen RA, et al. A phase II randomized trial of amphotericin B alone or combined with fluconazole in the treatment of HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis. Clin Infect Dis. Jun 15 2009;48(12):1775-1783. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19441980.
  20. Larsen RA, Bozzette SA, Jones BE, et al. Fluconazole combined with flucytosine for treatment of cryptococcal meningitis in patients with AIDS. Clin Infect Dis. Oct 1994;19(4):741-745. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7803641.
  21. Bicanic T, Meintjes G, Wood R, et al. Fungal burden, early fungicidal activity, and outcome in cryptococcal meningitis in antiretroviral-naive or antiretroviral-experienced patients treated with amphotericin B or fluconazole. Clin Infect Dis. Jul 1 2007;45(1):76-80. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17554704.
  22. Nussbaum JC, Jackson A, Namarika D, et al. Combination flucytosine and high-dose fluconazole compared with fluconazole monotherapy for the treatment of cryptococcal meningitis: a randomized trial in Malawi. Clin Infect Dis. Feb 1 2010;50(3):338-344. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20038244.
  23. Saag MS, Cloud GA, Graybill JR, et al. A comparison of itraconazole versus fluconazole as maintenance therapy for AIDS-associated cryptococcal meningitis. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group. Clin Infect Dis. Feb 1999;28(2):291-296. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10064246.
  24. Powderly WG, Saag MS, Cloud GA, et al. A controlled trial of fluconazole or amphotericin B to prevent relapse of cryptococcal meningitis in patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. The NIAID AIDS Clinical Trials Group and Mycoses Study Group. N Engl J Med. Mar 19 1992;326(12):793-798. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1538722.
  25. Perfect JR, Marr KA, Walsh TJ, et al. Voriconazole treatment for less-common, emerging, or refractory fungal infections. Clin Infect Dis. May 1 2003;36(9):1122-1131. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12715306.
  26. Pitisuttithum P, Negroni R, Graybill JR, et al. Activity of posaconazole in the treatment of central nervous system fungal infections. J Antimicrob Chemother. Oct 2005;56(4):745-755. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16135526.
  27. Zolopa A, Andersen J, Powderly W, et al. Early antiretroviral therapy reduces AIDS progression/death in individuals with acute opportunistic infections: a multicenter randomized strategy trial. PLoS One. 2009;4(5):e5575. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19440326.
  28. Makadzange AT, Ndhlovu CE, Takarinda K, et al. Early versus delayed initiation of antiretroviral therapy for concurrent HIV infection and cryptococcal meningitis in sub-saharan Africa. Clin Infect Dis. Jun 1 2010;50(11):1532-1538. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20415574.
  29. Fessler RD, Sobel J, Guyot L, et al. Management of elevated intracranial pressure in patients with Cryptococcal meningitis. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol. Feb 1 1998;17(2):137-142. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9473014.
  30. Shelburne SA, 3rd, Darcourt J, White AC, Jr., et al. The role of immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome in AIDS-related Cryptococcus neoformans disease in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy. Clin Infect Dis. Apr 1 2005;40(7):1049-1052. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15825000.
  31. Muller M, Wandel S, Colebunders R, et al. Immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome in patients starting antiretroviral therapy for HIV infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. Apr 2010;10(4):251-261. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20334848.
  32. Boulware DR, Bonham SC, Meya DB, et al. Paucity of initial cerebrospinal fluid inflammation in cryptococcal meningitis is associated with subsequent immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome. J Infect Dis. Sep 15 2010;202(6):962-970. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20677939.
  33. Haddow LJ, Colebunders R, Meintjes G, et al. Cryptococcal immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome in HIV-1-infected individuals: proposed clinical case definitions. Lancet Infect Dis. Nov 2010;10(11):791-802. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21029993.
  34. Brandt ME, Pfaller MA, Hajjeh RA, et al. Trends in antifungal drug susceptibility of Cryptococcus neoformans isolates in the United States: 1992 to 1994 and 1996 to 1998. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. Nov 2001;45(11):3065-3069. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11600357.
  35. Witt MD, Lewis RJ, Larsen RA, et al. Identification of patients with acute AIDS-associated cryptococcal meningitis who can be effectively treated with fluconazole: the role of antifungal susceptibility testing. Clin Infect Dis. Feb 1996;22(2):322-328. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8838190.
  36. Chen SC, Australasian Society for Infectious Diseases Mycoses Iterest G. Cryptococcosis in Australasia and the treatment of cryptococcal and other fungal infections with liposomal amphotericin B. J Antimicrob Chemother. Feb 2002;49 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):57-61. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11801583.
  37. Kirk O, Reiss P, Uberti-Foppa C, et al. Safe interruption of maintenance therapy against previous infection with four common HIV-associated opportunistic pathogens during potent antiretroviral therapy. Ann Intern Med. Aug 20 2002;137(4):239-250. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12186514.
  38. Vibhagool A, Sungkanuparph S, Mootsikapun P, et al. Discontinuation of secondary prophylaxis for cryptococcal meningitis in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients treated with highly active antiretroviral therapy: a prospective, multicenter, randomized study. Clin Infect Dis. May 15 2003;36(10):1329-1331. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12746781.
  39. Mussini C, Pezzotti P, Miro JM, et al. Discontinuation of maintenance therapy for cryptococcal meningitis in patients with AIDS treated with highly active antiretroviral therapy: an international observational study. Clin Infect Dis. Feb 15 2004;38(4):565-571. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14765351.
  40. Pursley TJ, Blomquist IK, Abraham J, Andersen HF, Bartley JA. Fluconazole-induced congenital anomalies in three infants. Clin Infect Dis. Feb 1996;22(2):336-340. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8838193.
  41. Norgaard M, Pedersen L, Gislum M, et al. Maternal use of fluconazole and risk of congenital malformations: a Danish population-based cohort study. J Antimicrob Chemother. Jul 2008;62(1):172-176. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18400803.
  42. Mastroiacovo P, Mazzone T, Botto LD, et al. Prospective assessment of pregnancy outcomes after first-trimester exposure to fluconazole. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Dec 1996;175(6):1645-1650. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8987954.
  43. De Santis M, Di Gianantonio E, Cesari E, Ambrosini G, Straface G, Clementi M. First-trimester itraconazole exposure and pregnancy outcome: a prospective cohort study of women contacting teratology information services in Italy. Drug Saf. 2009;32(3):239-244. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19338381.
  44. Bar-Oz B, Moretti ME, Bishai R, et al. Pregnancy outcome after in utero exposure to itraconazole: a prospective cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Sep 2000;183(3):617-620. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10992182.

 

Back to Top